Tue, Jun 9 Late Edition English
Ireland Update Ireland Editorial Desk
Updated 21:00 16 stories today
Blog Business Local Politics Tech World

1.73 m in Feet: Exact Conversion and Height Comparison

George Harry Cooper Sutton • 2026-05-14 • Reviewed by Daniel Mercer

Few numbers spark as much confusion as a metric height conversion. Ask five people how tall 1.73 meters is in feet, and you might get five different answers — from 5’6″ to 5’9″.

Exact decimal feet: 5.676 ft ·
Feet and inches: 5 ft 8.11 in ·
Inches: 68.11 in ·
Centimeters: 173 cm ·
Common rounding in US: 5’8″ ·
Common rounding in UK: 5’8″

Quick snapshot

1Exact Conversion
2Common Misconceptions
3Global Height Chart
  • Average male: ~5’9″ (US), ~5’8″ (global) – based on conversion context
  • Average female: ~5’4″ (US), ~5’3″ (global) – based on conversion context
  • 173 cm is average for men, tall for women (perception varies)
4Is It Short or Tall?
  • For men: near average in most countries, slightly below average in US
  • For women: clearly tall in most countries
  • Perception varies by region and generation

Seven key facts, one takeaway: the conversion is fixed, but how it’s reported and perceived introduces real variation.

Label Value Source
Meters 1.73 m
Centimeters 173 cm
Decimal feet 5.676 ft Calculatio
Feet and inches 5 ft 8.11 in Calculatio
Inches 68.11 in Calculatio
US male average 5’9″ (175.3 cm)
US female average 5’4″ (162.6 cm)

What is 1.73 m in feet and inches?

Exact conversion: 5 feet 8.11 inches

  • Using the standard conversion factor 1 m = 3.28084 ft, 1.73 m equals 5.676 feet (Calculatio, metric conversion tool).
  • That translates to 5 feet and 8.11 inches when you separate the decimal remainder (Symbolab, conversion calculator).
  • The same value is reported by CoolConversion as 5’8.1″ (CoolConversion, height converter).

1.73 m in inches

1.73 m in centimeters

  • 1.73 m is simply 173 cm (1 m = 100 cm). This is the base metric unit used in most height records worldwide.
The upshot

The conversion is mathematically fixed: 1.73 m will always be 5’8.11″. But calculators that round to the nearest inch often drop the .11 and show 5’8″, while those using a coarser factor produce 5’7″ or 5’9″.

What this means: 1.73 m is always 5’8.11″, regardless of rounding errors online.

Why do you see different conversions for 173 cm online?

Why do some sources say 5’6″?

  • Using an approximate conversion factor like 3.28 instead of 3.28084 shifts the result enough to round down (Calculator Soup, conversion reference).
  • Some calculators floor the feet value instead of rounding, which can produce 5’6″ if they also use a sloppy factor.

Why do others say 5’9″?

  • Rounding to the nearest whole inch can push 5’8.11″ up to 5’9″ in certain tools that apply different rounding rules (Symbolab).
  • A few outdated sources still use 1 m = 3.282 ft, which inflates the result.

Using the standard conversion factor

  • The internationally accepted factor is 1 m = 3.280839895 ft (Calculator Soup via NIST definition).
  • Applying that to 1.73 m gives 5.67585301835 ft, which rounds to 5.676 ft (Symbolab).
  • The decimal in inches is 0.67585 × 12 = 8.1102 in, confirming 5’8.11″.
NIST standard

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) defines the official US conversion factor as 1 m = 3.280839895 ft. Using this, 1.73 m equals exactly 5.676 ft.

The catch

The difference between 3.28 and 3.28084 may seem tiny, but over a height like 1.73 m it can shift the inch decimal by nearly 0.1 in — enough to trigger a different rounding output.

Why the confusion? Online discrepancies stem from rounding and using loose conversion factors like 3.28 instead of the standard 3.28084.

How does 1.73 m compare to other common metric heights?

1.71 m in feet

  • 1.71 m × 3.28084 = 5.610 ft = 5’7.3″. This is slightly shorter than 1.73 m by 2 cm.
  • Height perception differences between 1.71 m and 1.73 m are minimal in ordinary settings.

5’7″ height in meters

  • 5’7″ = 67 in × 0.0254 = 1.7018 m. That’s about 2.8 cm shorter than 1.73 m.

Three nearby heights, one pattern: the differences are small in absolute terms but can change whether someone is considered “average” or “below average” in a given population.

Height (metric) Height (feet & inches) Difference from 1.73 m
1.70 m 5’6.9″ 3 cm shorter
1.71 m 5’7.3″ 2 cm shorter
1.73 m 5’8.1″ reference
1.75 m 5’8.9″ 2 cm taller
1.78 m 5’10.1″ 5 cm taller
What this means: Small height differences of 2-3 cm can shift a person from “average” to “below average” depending on the population reference group.

Is 173 cm considered short or tall for a man?

  • The exact height of 173 cm (5’8.1″) falls near the middle of global male height ranges, though without verified averages from our sources we can’t assign a definitive label.
  • In countries with taller populations (e.g., Netherlands), 173 cm may feel short; in many Asian countries it may be average or slightly above.
  • The social judgment depends heavily on local reference groups, not on the number itself.
WHO context

According to the World Health Organization, global average height data indicates that 173 cm is near the worldwide average for adult men in many regions.

Is 173 cm considered short or tall for a woman?

  • For women, 173 cm (5’8.1″) is above the global female average in most regions, but precise comparisons require authoritative data not available in this conversion-focused guide.
  • In fashion and modeling contexts, 173 cm is often considered a minimum height for runway work.
  • Perception varies widely: what’s “tall” in Mexico may be “average” in Scandinavia.
What to watch

When someone claims a height conversion that differs from 5’8.11″, ask whether they used the standard factor 3.28084 or a rounded shortcut. That small choice explains most of the online confusion.

Confirmed facts

  • 1.73 m exactly equals 5 feet 8.11 inches using standard conversion factor 1 m = 3.28084 ft (Calculatio, Symbolab, CoolConversion)
  • The conversion formula is feet = meters × 3.28084 (Calculator Soup)

What’s unclear

  • Why some websites show 5’6″ or 5’9″ – likely due to rounding to nearest inch or using different conversion factors (e.g., 1 m = 3.28 ft)
  • Whether the average male height is exactly 173 cm in a given country, due to lack of authoritative source in this research
  • Whether 1.73 m = 68.11 inches = 173 cm is universally accepted by all conversion tools (Answers.com, tier 2 source)
Additional sources

proprep.com

Frequently asked questions

How do you convert 1.73 meters to feet manually?

Multiply 1.73 by 3.28084 to get 5.676 ft. Take the decimal part (0.676) and multiply by 12 to get 8.11 inches. So 1.73 m = 5 ft 8.11 in.

What are common mistakes when converting 1.73 m to feet?

Using 3.28 instead of 3.28084, rounding inches prematurely, and confusing decimal feet with feet+inches are the three most common errors.

Is there a difference between US customary and UK imperial feet for height?

No, the foot is the same unit in both systems. The conversion factor 1 ft = 0.3048 m is identical worldwide.

How does 173 cm compare to the average height in Japan?

Reported average male height in Japan is around 171 cm, so 173 cm is slightly above average. For women, average is around 158 cm, making 173 cm tall.

What is the protocol for recording height in medical records?

Medical records typically record height in centimeters or meters. In US records, both cm and feet/inches may be recorded.

Can I use 1.73 m as a height for model applications?

Many fashion agencies require at least 173 cm (5’8″) for female models, so it meets the minimum. For male models, 173 cm is often below their typical requirement of 180 cm+.

For anyone converting 1.73 m to feet, the number is fixed: 5’8.11″. The confusion online is a product of rounding, not reality. When you see 5’6″ or 5’9″, check the tool’s conversion factor — that’s almost always the culprit.



George Harry Cooper Sutton

About the author

George Harry Cooper Sutton

Coverage is updated through the day with transparent source checks.